Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Laramie Wall's avatar

Foot note 1. I find that interesting, because I'm not a massive con-goer, but I hear people talk about this one compared to the aforementioned GenCon, and reportedly, the GameholeCon one is a massive improvement. No idea though.

Foot note 3. Yeah, I can't get into Shadowrun. I don't want magic in my tech game, personally.

Foot note 6. I gave a gimme during my Sunday AM game. I don't even remember what it was. Was it BoxcarVampire's roll? But it was something stupid and I made it a gimme as well, so I'm guilty there. (I want to say it was some easy roll where I made everyone roll, more for who than if, but I'm failing to recall).

Expand full comment
DED's avatar

Yeah, I'm one of those people who love Crawford's #WN stuff. Sorry that you didn't have a good time with it. I love the open sandbox and its flexibility. I don't mind the wordiness. He's cramming everything you need into one tome unlike many other games where you have to buy multiple books in order run a game. And I think that it's less complicated than all of the generations of D&D that came after 1e.

As for Shadowrun, I get what you're saying about mixing magic and tech (Hell, I don't even like psionics in my sci-fi). Having never played it though, I joined in Nezz's Shadowrun one-off using CWN rules. I'm in it primarily to play in a CWN game. And to make it interesting, it's set in Thailand.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts